I don't need no stinking headline.

I want to march for climate action.  I support 350 Bay Area to the extent that it facilitates the march.


commented on Clean Energy 2015-05-28 09:55:23 -0700 · Flag
It seems Bill McKibben made up his mind long ago to ignore nuclear power and its advocates, if Timothy Maloney’s email has gotten no response after a whole year. Is 350.org a grass-roots organization or a top-down organization?
TJM, your excellent letter should have persuaded BM to at least mention nuclear power as one of the non-carbon-emitting options, if he were at all serious in his quest to reduce CO2 emissions. Well, BM? Say something!!

signed Air District Board: Take real climate leadership now 2015-01-19 17:54:10 -0800
Watch this and you’ll know how we can end GHG emissions utterly and completely by 2040 (“Can Thorium End Our Energy Crisis?”, 10 minute video): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2vzotsvvkw&feature=share

Air District Board: Take real climate leadership now

2013.08.07_KXL_vote_BAAQMD_cropped200x114px.jpg

The Air District's Climate Protection Program began 10 years ago, yet not one rule to limit greenhouse gases (GHGs) from stationary sources has been adopted, and in 2012 the Air District actually amended its Permit Regulation to exclude even a review of GHG emissions (let alone require reductions) from virtually all permit evaluations.

The Air District is focused on a long term Regional Climate Action Strategy. We asked for and fully support that.

But it's also urgent to take action now to reduce GHG emissions. Many solutions are already well understood. The Air District has the power and the responsibility to implement them.

Most GHG emissions come from combustion, as do particulate emissions (which according to a 2012 BAAQMD report kill 1,700 Bay Areans every year). Only by ending reliance on combustion for heat and power can we clean the air and protect the climate. Industries, developers and vendors will need a long lead time to bring solutions to market. The time to begin the process is now.

Clean energy systems are already being installed on new and existing residential and commercial buildings in the Bay Area. Clean buildings are the "low hanging fruit" for GHG reductions. The time is ripe to promote Bay Area climate action leadership and work toward a regional mandate.

EXTRA LOVE to people who also post personal comments.

BAAQMD Board Members will read them!

Petition

970 signatures

Dear BAAQMD Board,

Please take real climate leadership and direct Air District staff to:

  • DECARBONIZE BAY AREA INDUSTRIES — Set a goal and pathway to decarbonize Bay Area industries. Overhaul combustion rules to move Bay Area industries toward clean technology and design alternatives as well as efficiency improvements.
  • AIR PERMIT RULES — Eliminate the GHG exclusion, and incorporate emission reduction goals into permit rules. Stop GHG emission increases. Achieve actual reductions.
  • CLEAN BUILDINGS — Develop and promote model rules for clean buildings beyond California requirements. Work toward the elimination of combustion GHGs and all other pollutants from building systems and appliances.
  • CLEAN POWER — Investigate and implement every avenue the Air District can take to support, mandate and fund clean power generation through CEQA mitigation, permitting and regulatory action.
  • STAFFING — Assign sufficient staff to GHG rule development.

 


commented on Home 2015-05-17 23:22:37 -0700 · Flag
“Overview of Nuclear Energy”
Thuy T. Le, Ph.D., San Jose State University
May 24, 2015 at 12:45-2:00 pm in the Fireside Room,
First Unitarian Church, 160 North Third Street, San Jose, CA

Free and open to the public

At this meeting of the church’s Rights Of Nature group, Professor Le will describe how nuclear power can contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions while delivering energy in the increasingly large quantities needed for growing populations and socioeconomic development. In addition to the basics of electric power generation and nuclear reactor technologies, Professor Le will cover all the hot-button issues surrounding nuclear power, including environmental impacts, fuel cycles and waste management, safety, security, proliferation and accidents. Objections to the Generation II reactors prevalent today have driven technological advances that make the emerging Generation III and future Generation IV reactors much safer and more efficient, secure, sustainable, competitive and versatile.

In an open letter to the environmental community, former NASA climatologist Dr. James Hansen wrote, “While it may be theoretically possible to stabilize the climate without nuclear power, in the real world there is no credible path to climate stabilization that does not include a substantial role for nuclear power.” Attend Professor Le’s talk to find out why.

Questions about this event can be addressed by Mike Pelizzari, nextgalaxy@aol.com, 408-742-7810.

Born, became bike-riding physicist, dodging death at every turn.